In America only Certain People have rights to Protection from the Law - Most All are just Collateral Damage to Protect Corrupt Attorneys, Judges, DOJ Officials, Corrupt FBI agents, Billionaire Tech Companies, Major Media Companies and Mega Law Firms.
Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...
******
"" KernelOfTruth says:There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the
theft of patents worth at least
one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).
The reason you may be interested is that it is
a Florida case with ties
to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.
The shenanigans are
unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the
Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.
If you are interested, you can go to
http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to
the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.
If you prefer, you can
read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdfThe inventor and main person being abused,
Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in
New York, involving
public corruption. One case brought up concerns
a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.
He identifies
William J. Dick of the
Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with
Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from
Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.
The
criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former
IBM patent attorney William Dick to write
Friedkin’s patents in his name and place them into a company incorporated by
Christopher C.Wheeler of
Proskauer Rose.
According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been
convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader,
Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of
Proskauer Rose.
This scam is identified
by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also by
Stephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his
Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace
Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.
Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of
the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for
Palm Beach County, in the
State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.
For instance, the Judge [
Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.
Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with
the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in
a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the
law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by
shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or
Labarga’s court and the Bankruptcy
Court, believing that justice would be had.
Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by
Proskauer Rose and
Proskauer Rose referred management Utley,
Michael Reale and an entity
RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured by
Proskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly
acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.
With
new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once
Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.
Thus, when combined,
the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:
(i)
Proskauer Rose would sue
fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill
(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in a
bankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and
(iii)
with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating
the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that
Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.
It was related that one of the counsel [
Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the
Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge]
Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.
Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to
Warner Brothers of entries with investor
H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.
The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for
FBI Agents in the network [of
the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the
Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI,
were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the
Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.
Page 20 holds a
critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and
Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous
Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s
booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on
a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies
almost stolen from Iviewit which are
the true cause of the collapse of Enron.
All evidence of this had to be destroyed by
the law firms who had
perpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of
the massive shredding party”.
For a story about the
“Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.
The tale involves
accusations regarding lawyers submitting
false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before
the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in
the Civil Courts as the
criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to
avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed,
the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],
..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled]
Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of
the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departments when the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],
...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled]
Foley and Lardner Law Firm is controlling a certain tier of the
Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the
Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and
Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that
Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (
Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].
The behavior of the President of
The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the
brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature
without need for FBI involvement, Special Agent
Joseph Sconzo’s denial that there was
any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.
Special Agent in Charge
John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit or
Eliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with
the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by
the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the
Small Business Administration is the largest
investor and shareholder through
SBIC loans, the
lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of
Special Agents for political reasons,
... an admittance of
no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former
Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the
Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]
The
gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with
a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.
We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.
Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to
the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.],
Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.
I am in grave concern that
the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.
A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to
steal such inventions and murder inventors.
In fact, in
a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.
Where a group of citizens have brought
allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life,
it is stunning that FBI officers who have been
fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota of protection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.
Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through
violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that
no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. "" 
